Alimenté par : Claudia (ADFI Alsace)
Cet outil s'appuie sur PubMind
PubMind est une plateforme collaborative de veille scientifique qui permet d'importer des publications depuis PubMed, de suivre leur avancement de lecture, d'en extraire les éléments méthodologiques clés (protocoles, variables, résultats) et de constituer une synthèse structurée afin de faciliter la réalisation de revues de littérature. Entièrement personnalisable, cet outil s'adapte aux thématiques de recherche de ses utilisateurs.
Nous l'avons configuré ici pour centraliser et analyser la littérature scientifique concernant les croyances, les traitements psychologiques, l'étude de la scrupulosité, ainsi que l'impact et la prise en charge des troubles liés aux dérives sectaires.
Dernière synchronisation le 05/06/2026
Front Public Health . 2025;13 :1711669
INTRODUCTION: The global increase in the incidence of early-onset cancer underscores the urgent need to understand the behavioral determinants of prevention effectiveness. This study aimed to examine the fundamental roles of supernatural and scientific beliefs in shaping health-related cognitions and their potentially conflicting influences on cancer prevention behaviors.METHODS: Based on health locus of control (HLOC) theory, a dual-pathway attitudinal model was developed and tested using a two-step procedure to validate the model with data from a national survey ( = 938) of young Chinese adults.RESULTS: The results indicated that both supernatural and scientific beliefs significantly predicted cancer control beliefs and prevention behaviors. Specifically, Chinese supernatural beliefs negatively predicted cancer prevention behaviors through cancer fatalism (external HLOC). In contrast, positive scientific attitudes were positively associated with cancer prevention behaviors through cancer controllability (internal HLOC). Furthermore, positive scientific attitudes mitigated the detrimental effects of supernatural beliefs on cancer prevention behaviors by reducing cancer fatalism and strengthening perceived cancer controllability.DISCUSSION: These findings elucidate the underlying factors contributing to both effective and ineffective cancer prevention and identify potential pathways for intervention and education. Both theoretical and practical implications are discussed.