Alimenté par : Claudia (ADFI Alsace)
Cet outil s'appuie sur PubMind
PubMind est une plateforme collaborative de veille scientifique qui permet d'importer des publications depuis PubMed, de suivre leur avancement de lecture, d'en extraire les éléments méthodologiques clés (protocoles, variables, résultats) et de constituer une synthèse structurée afin de faciliter la réalisation de revues de littérature. Entièrement personnalisable, cet outil s'adapte aux thématiques de recherche de ses utilisateurs.
Nous l'avons configuré ici pour centraliser et analyser la littérature scientifique concernant les croyances, les traitements psychologiques, l'étude de la scrupulosité, ainsi que l'impact et la prise en charge des troubles liés aux dérives sectaires.
Dernière synchronisation le 05/06/2026
Psychol Psychother
OBJECTIVE: Hearing voices is often experienced as being controlling, powerful, threatening or critical. This study aimed to examine the lived experiences of autonomy among people who hear voices.DESIGN: Employing a qualitative design, this study sought to examine the personal narratives and meaning-making processes of voice hearers and gain deeper insights into the nuanced ways autonomy is experienced, diminished, attempted, re-established and constructed by those who hear voices.METHOD: In-depth semi-structured phenomenological interviews with six voice hearers were analysed using interpretative phenomenological analysis to capture the ways participants interpret and respond to their experiences.RESULTS: Participants' accounts revealed that autonomy was continuously negotiated, requiring reflection, adaptation and self-regulation. Three superordinate themes were identified in the data. First, participants reflected on how hearing voices challenged their sense of self, individuality and the space available for self-authorship. As such, developing a personally meaningful narrative was crucial for re-establishing autonomy. Second, they portrayed a co-existing dynamic where autonomy and power were shared and negotiated with voices. Third, participants described how hearing voices interfered with their perceived competence, and decision-making, introducing limitations to their ability to navigate life on their own terms. Participants' capacity for integration, and perceptions of their ability to influence and cause change, affected the extent to which they felt self-determined.CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the importance of supporting voice hearers in constructing meaningful, self-oriented narratives to strengthen their sense of autonomy. Future research should explore strategies that empower voice hearers to integrate their experiences constructively, thereby promoting resilience and autonomy.