Alimenté par : Claudia (ADFI Alsace)
Cet outil s'appuie sur PubMind
PubMind est une plateforme collaborative de veille scientifique qui permet d'importer des publications depuis PubMed, de suivre leur avancement de lecture, d'en extraire les éléments méthodologiques clés (protocoles, variables, résultats) et de constituer une synthÚse structurée afin de faciliter la réalisation de revues de littérature. EntiÚrement personnalisable, cet outil s'adapte aux thématiques de recherche de ses utilisateurs.
Nous l'avons configuré ici pour centraliser et analyser la littérature scientifique concernant les croyances, les traitements psychologiques, l'étude de la scrupulosité, ainsi que l'impact et la prise en charge des troubles liés aux dérives sectaires.
DerniĂšre synchronisation le 05/06/2026
J Relig Health
Recent research has shown the widespread prevalence of psychological distress. Different aspects of religion can operate both as a resource and a barrier to good mental health. Religious beliefs about the causes of mental and emotional distress may be one such barrier-as such, this research examined whether religious/spiritual (R/S) attributions of emotional distress were associated with psychological distress and whether that relationship might be mediated by psychological flexibility. The study surveyed 620 online participants (Meanâ=â42.9; SDâ=â16.3) and 676 undergraduate students (Meanâ=â21.8; SDâ=â6.71) in the USA. Those in the online sample had negative associations between R/S attributions and psychological flexibility, which partly accounted for the association between R/S attributions and psychological distress. R/S attributions were not predictive of psychological flexibility or psychological distress in the undergraduate sample. Believing that emotional distress is a religious punishment or caused by sin may change interpretations of such distress, increasing experiential avoidance of those emotions. The findings have implications for clinical practice, emphasizing the importance of addressing R/S attributions in therapeutic settings. This research also highlights the need for a more detailed understanding of how religious beliefs and psychological flexibility interact in individuals' responses to uncomfortable emotions and thoughts.