Alimenté par : Claudia (ADFI Alsace)
Cet outil s'appuie sur PubMind
PubMind est une plateforme collaborative de veille scientifique qui permet d'importer des publications depuis PubMed, de suivre leur avancement de lecture, d'en extraire les éléments méthodologiques clés (protocoles, variables, résultats) et de constituer une synthèse structurée afin de faciliter la réalisation de revues de littérature. Entièrement personnalisable, cet outil s'adapte aux thématiques de recherche de ses utilisateurs.
Nous l'avons configuré ici pour centraliser et analyser la littérature scientifique concernant les croyances, les traitements psychologiques, l'étude de la scrupulosité, ainsi que l'impact et la prise en charge des troubles liés aux dérives sectaires.
Dernière synchronisation le 05/06/2026
Neurosci Biobehav Rev . 2025;177 :106319
The emergence of spiritual and religious practices can be seen as a major cognitive transition in the evolution of biological organisms. Spiritual and religious experiences are closely linked to evolved complex brain structures, as well as their dynamics and plasticity. In this review, we will focus on the neural mechanisms that make such experiences possible. We will also address the methodological, neurophilosophical and neurotheological questions concerning the extent to which religious and spiritual experiences can be neurobiologically explained. We will summarise the rapidly expanding knowledge about the neuroscience of meditation and prayer, near-death experiences, ecstatic epilepsy, psychedelic experiences, and changes in spirituality associated with brain lesions. Additionally, we will discuss the validity of suggestions, based on predictive processing theory, that ecstatic states may represent a pathology of the mind and brain in the form of impaired prediction. Finally, we will describe the beneficial and therapeutic effects of spiritual and religious routines and practices and put them in the context of evolutionary medicine. Overall, we will argue that 'neurospirituality' research can be fruitful if it avoids both excessive reductionism as well as dualism. Instead, it should be based on limited reductionism, balanced by more integrative, non-localisationist approaches, including dynamical systems, complex systems and network theory.