Alimenté par : Claudia (ADFI Alsace)
Cet outil s'appuie sur PubMind
PubMind est une plateforme collaborative de veille scientifique qui permet d'importer des publications depuis PubMed, de suivre leur avancement de lecture, d'en extraire les éléments méthodologiques clés (protocoles, variables, résultats) et de constituer une synthèse structurée afin de faciliter la réalisation de revues de littérature. Entièrement personnalisable, cet outil s'adapte aux thématiques de recherche de ses utilisateurs.
Nous l'avons configuré ici pour centraliser et analyser la littérature scientifique concernant les croyances, les traitements psychologiques, l'étude de la scrupulosité, ainsi que l'impact et la prise en charge des troubles liés aux dérives sectaires.
Dernière synchronisation le 05/06/2026
PLoS One . 2026;21 (5) :e0347608
Divine forgiveness (DF), the subjective experience of being forgiven by a higher power after a transgression, remains understudied in psychology, particularly across diverse cultural and religious contexts. This study examines priests' experiences and understandings of DF, both as confessors and penitents, in the Catholic Sacrament of Confession through semi-structured interviews with ten Spanish-speaking priests from Spain, Mexico, Peru, and Chile. Guided by a constructivist stance and a Christian-sensitive relational spirituality model of personal sin, we conducted a theory-informed framework analysis combining inductive coding with iterative matrix-based synthesis. Findings showed that 1) confession emerged as a relational and dynamic encounter involving the self, sin, God, others, and the confessor, whose mediating role makes DF tangible; 2) DF unfolded across phases of vulnerability, repentance, confession, penance, and absolution; 3) barriers included guilt, shame, and scrupulosity, whereas facilitators involved empathetic priestly presence and communal support; and 4) participants distinguished between cognitive certainty of DF and its emotional realization enabled by the confessor's presence. These findings provide preliminary, contextually grounded insights related to both Christian-sensitive and faith-neutral models of DF, which should be further examined and empirically tested in future research.