Alimenté par : Claudia (ADFI Alsace)
Cet outil s'appuie sur PubMind
Un accès direct à la littérature scientifique via la base PubMed permettant de faciliter la veille sur les enjeux complexes de la santé mentale et du fait religieux : de la neuroscience des croyances à l'étude des abus spirituels, en passant par la prise en charge des traumatismes et des processus de déconversion.
Dernière synchronisation le 07/06/2026
JAMIA Open . 2025;8 (5) :ooaf102
OBJECTIVES: Large language models (LLMs) face challenges in inductive thematic analysis, a task requiring deep interpretive, domain-specific expertise. We evaluated the feasibility of using LLMs to replicate expert-driven thematic analysis of social media data.MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using 2 temporally nonintersecting Reddit datasets on xylazine ( = 286 and 686, for model optimization and validation, respectively) with 12 expert-derived themes, we evaluated 5 LLMs against expert coding. We modeled the task as a series of binary classifications, rather than a single, multilabel classification, employing zero-, single-, and few-shot prompting strategies and measuring performance via accuracy, precision, recall, and F score.RESULTS: On the validation set, GPT-4o with 2-shot prompting performed best (accuracy: 90.9%; F score: 0.71). For high-prevalence themes, model-derived thematic distributions closely mirrored expert classifications (eg, xylazine: 13.6% vs 17.8%; medications for opioid use disorders: 16.5% vs 17.8%).CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that few-shot LLM-based approaches can automate thematic analyses, offering a scalable supplement for qualitative research.