Alimenté par : Claudia (ADFI Alsace), Gaëlle (ADFI), Isabelle, Maïlé Onfray
Cet outil s'appuie sur PubMind
Un accès direct à la littérature scientifique via la base PubMed permettant de faciliter la veille sur les enjeux complexes de la santé mentale et du fait religieux : de la neuroscience des croyances à l'étude des abus spirituels, en passant par la prise en charge des traumatismes et des processus de déconversion.
Dernière synchronisation le 23/06/2026
Crit Care Med
OBJECTIVES: To assess perceptions, beliefs, and conceptual understanding of brain death among ICU professionals at three Swiss hospitals and to examine their associations with personal, educational, and professional experiences.DESIGN: Cross-sectional questionnaire-based survey.SETTING: Multicenter survey at three Swiss care centers.SUBJECTS: ICU healthcare professionals (i.e., physicians and nurses).INTERVENTIONS: None.MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Questionnaires assessed demographics, religious beliefs, professional experience, exposure to brain death cases, knowledge of diagnostic criteria, and emotional and ethical attitudes using closed-ended and semi-open questions, Likert scales (1 = "very unsure," "absolutely not" to 10 = "very sure," "absolutely"), and checklists. Endpoints were (primary) perceptions, beliefs, conceptual understanding of brain death, and (secondary) interprofessional differences and associations/correlations with personal, educational, social, and professional factors. Among 338 ICU professionals (78.1% nurses, 74% women), key diagnostic brain death criteria were well recognized, although misconceptions about nonessential tests persisted. Self-perceived understanding and approval were high (both median Likert scores, 9; interquartile range [IQR], 8-10), while agreement that a brain-dead patient is not a patient but a corpse was much lower (median, 1; IQR, 1-4). Physicians showed greater approval than nurses (p = 0.003) and were more likely to equate brain death with circulatory death (p < 0.001). Understanding increased with ICU experience (ρ = 0.194) and age (ρ = 0.213; both p < 0.001) and was higher among those with prior exposure to brain death or its diagnostics (both p < 0.001). No significant associations were found for sex, religious beliefs, parenthood, or bereavement.CONCLUSIONS: Although Swiss ICU professionals generally endorse and understand the brain death concept, our data indicate specific areas for improvement in conceptual clarity, particularly among nurses and less experienced professionals. In contrast to personal/philosophical influences, clinical exposure increases understanding and alignment with definitions, underscoring the need for targeted interdisciplinary education.