Alimenté par : Claudia (ADFI Alsace)
Cet outil s'appuie sur PubMind
PubMind est une plateforme collaborative de veille scientifique qui permet d'importer des publications depuis PubMed, de suivre leur avancement de lecture, d'en extraire les éléments méthodologiques clés (protocoles, variables, résultats) et de constituer une synthèse structurée afin de faciliter la réalisation de revues de littérature. Entièrement personnalisable, cet outil s'adapte aux thématiques de recherche de ses utilisateurs.
Nous l'avons configuré ici pour centraliser et analyser la littérature scientifique concernant les croyances, les traitements psychologiques, l'étude de la scrupulosité, ainsi que l'impact et la prise en charge des troubles liés aux dérives sectaires.
Dernière synchronisation le 05/06/2026
Nord J Psychiatry . 2002;56 (4) :247-51
A cross-sectional point prevalence study of the DSM-III-R prodromal symptoms in non-psychotic (n = 501) consecutive outpatients from a catchment area with 260000 inhabitants is presented. The relationship between the three most psychosis-specific prodromal symptoms and the development of psychosis during the following 6 months was also explored. The prevalence of any prodromal symptom was 25%, the most prevalent being impairment of role functioning (14%), isolation and withdrawal (11%) and lack of initiative (8%). The most prevalent symptom in affective disorders was lack of initiative (14%); in personality disorders, it was impairment of role functioning (21%). The prevalences of the most psychosis-specific symptoms "peculiar behaviour", "magical thinking" and "unusual perceptual experiences" was 1-2%. At re-evaluation 6 months later, three of 20 patients (15%) with one or more such symptoms had become psychotic, two with schizoaffective disorder, one with affective psychosis. It was concluded that DSM-III prodromal symptoms are common among non-psychotic outpatients, but most such symptoms are non-specific for psychosis. Persistent peculiar behaviour, magical thinking and unusual perceptual experiences have a very low prevalence but may indicate an increased risk for psychosis. Such patients should be followed with that risk in mind.