Alimenté par : Claudia (ADFI Alsace)
Cet outil s'appuie sur PubMind
PubMind est une plateforme collaborative de veille scientifique qui permet d'importer des publications depuis PubMed, de suivre leur avancement de lecture, d'en extraire les éléments méthodologiques clés (protocoles, variables, résultats) et de constituer une synthèse structurée afin de faciliter la réalisation de revues de littérature. Entièrement personnalisable, cet outil s'adapte aux thématiques de recherche de ses utilisateurs.
Nous l'avons configuré ici pour centraliser et analyser la littérature scientifique concernant les croyances, les traitements psychologiques, l'étude de la scrupulosité, ainsi que l'impact et la prise en charge des troubles liés aux dérives sectaires.
Dernière synchronisation le 05/06/2026
Med Educ . 2004;38 (12) :1278-87
INTRODUCTION: This paper extends the work of an earlier publication by the same author which reported the findings of a case study designed to investigate how medical students learn and are taught in the operating theatre. The earlier paper was descriptive in nature, examining the challenges students face as learners in theatres. These were conceptualised around 3 key domains: the challenge posed by the physical environment; the challenge of the educational task, and the challenge of managing and negotiating a role as a participant in the professional workplace of theatres. This paper focuses exclusively on the third domain. It presents an interpretive model of teaching and learning in the operating theatre, drawing largely on conceptual frameworks developed within the literature on learning in work-based settings.METHODS: A multimethod strategy included observation in theatres, interviews with students and surgeons, and a student survey. The themes that characterised the case were identified and the relationships among these themes were explored, leading to the development of the model. Symbolic interactionism provided the underlying theoretical framework.CONCLUSION: In any particular theatre session, the way in which learning evolves or is obstructed for any student, and the shape that teaching takes, depends on the interpretations that the student and the surgeon make in 'sizing up' the teaching and learning environment. How surgeons and students interpret and respond to each others' behaviour, style, attitude and even demeanour, has consequences for the way teaching and learning develop. The concepts of legitimacy and trust underpin these interpretations and are central to understanding the processes of teaching and learning in this setting.