Alimenté par : Claudia (ADFI Alsace)
Cet outil s'appuie sur PubMind
PubMind est une plateforme collaborative de veille scientifique qui permet d'importer des publications depuis PubMed, de suivre leur avancement de lecture, d'en extraire les éléments méthodologiques clés (protocoles, variables, résultats) et de constituer une synthèse structurée afin de faciliter la réalisation de revues de littérature. Entièrement personnalisable, cet outil s'adapte aux thématiques de recherche de ses utilisateurs.
Nous l'avons configuré ici pour centraliser et analyser la littérature scientifique concernant les croyances, les traitements psychologiques, l'étude de la scrupulosité, ainsi que l'impact et la prise en charge des troubles liés aux dérives sectaires.
Dernière synchronisation le 05/06/2026
Acta Psychol (Amst) . 2026;266 :106764
This systematic review examines the willingness of victims and non-victims or members of civil society to forgive in the context of armed conflicts. The review addresses two primary research questions: (1) How do individuals affected by armed conflict conceptualize forgiveness? (2) What individual, interpersonal, and contextual factors influence their willingness to forgive? A total of 30 reviewed articles comprising 35 individual studies, published between 2000 and 2024, were retrieved from the Web of Science and Scopus databases, in English and Spanish. The final search was conducted in July 2025. Inclusion criteria focused on forgiveness in armed conflict settings, involving victims, non-victims or members of civil society. Studies addressing apology, reconciliation, and intergroup forgiveness were considered. Exclusion criteria included studies on forgiveness in family, romantic, educational, or criminal contexts unrelated to armed conflict, as well as books, conference proceedings, systematic reviews, and theoretical papers. Risk of bias was assessed using the CASP tool, which indicated low risk of bias in most studies, although some findings lack generalizability due to methodological limitations. The findings indicate that forgiveness is a complex and multidimensional process with significant implications for mental health, social reconciliation, and peacebuilding effort. Facilitating factors included acknowledgment of harm, apologies, justice measures, religious and cultural beliefs, and guarantees of non-repetition. Conversely, lack of trust, empathy, and the severity of offenses reduced willingness to forgive. Limitations include the heterogeneity of study designs and cultural contexts.