Alimenté par : Claudia (ADFI Alsace)
Cet outil s'appuie sur PubMind
PubMind est une plateforme collaborative de veille scientifique qui permet d'importer des publications depuis PubMed, de suivre leur avancement de lecture, d'en extraire les éléments méthodologiques clés (protocoles, variables, résultats) et de constituer une synthèse structurée afin de faciliter la réalisation de revues de littérature. Entièrement personnalisable, cet outil s'adapte aux thématiques de recherche de ses utilisateurs.
Nous l'avons configuré ici pour centraliser et analyser la littérature scientifique concernant les croyances, les traitements psychologiques, l'étude de la scrupulosité, ainsi que l'impact et la prise en charge des troubles liés aux dérives sectaires.
Dernière synchronisation le 05/06/2026
Internet Interv . 2026;44 :100940
BACKGROUND: Accessible early intervention is crucial given the high prevalence of youth mental health problems. In addition to walk-in peer counselling for 12-25-year-olds, the @ease centres in the Netherlands offer an online chat service. This study aimed to contribute to the limited literature on online peer support by analysing links between topics, counselling techniques, and young people's responses, informing larger future analyses and practice.METHODS: In 2023, a total of 2145 online chat sessions were held with 1160 individuals. A randomized subset was drawn for feasibility of this exploratory retrospective mixed methods study ( = 26). For the qualitative part, hybrid latent content analysis was performed using Atlas.ti 24 to infer topics, techniques, and response types. User responses were categorized as indicators of either good e.g. or poor client collaboration e.g. . A logistic regression analysis in SPSS 27 was conducted to explore associations between counselling techniques and response types.RESULTS: Most-discussed topics were social and occupational problems, problems related to parents, professional help and diagnoses, intimacy and sexuality, and suicidality. Of the 623 user responses within the 26 online chats, 423 (67.9%) reflected good client collaboration. Collaborative responses were positively associated with peer counsellors' empathising/affirming ( = 4.13, 95%CI 1.53-11.16, = 0.005) and negatively linked with their asking closed-ended questions ( = 0.23, 95%CI 0.11-0.47,